Is the state to blame for former foster
children ending up in poverty?
Introduction
In this essay, we will be discussing how former
foster children often end up in poverty in the US and are the state to blame
for this issue. Many TV shows and documentaries have addressed the foster care
issue and the importance of improving the situation. This inspired me to
research further and to have a better understanding of this issue.
Context
The Foster Care System is a system for
children under 18 to be transferred into a temporary home. Children go into the
foster care for many reasons. Some of them had parents who were unable to raise
a child, abandoned at birth, or they had too many troubles at their original
home. They are put into group homes or private homes with a guardian who is
referred to as a foster parent. Aging out of the foster care system is when a
foster child turns 18 and is removed from their foster home. This is because they
are expected to live independently and build a life for themselves. However, after
they "aged out" many former foster children aren't able to earn enough
money to afford the necessities therefore end up in jail or in poverty. Poverty
is a state when you don't have enough money or resources to support a basic lifestyle.
They didn't receive much education because they constantly move from one foster
home to another, which means changing schools. Most foster children change
homes frequently; some have been to 20 different foster homes within 10 years
(AdoptUsKids documentary). When their allowances are cut many of them can't get
a decent job and don't have enough money to continue education. Leaving them in
a very insecure situation, which can result in them becoming homeless and
living in poverty.
Some foster children also get abused in their
foster homes and often get blamed for being troublesome which also causes them
to not focus on getting a better education. A lot of the young people have
mixed feelings about aging out because they are often vulnerable in the outside
world but they are also eager to live by their own rules. The average age for
young adults to leave home is age 24, compared to the foster children leaving
home at 18; it makes it difficult to be successful. Statistics also show that
3/10 of homeless people in the US were former foster children. A California
study stated that 35% of foster children were arrested. In 2011, 25-55% of
the former foster children were unemployed and even the employed ones had low
wages that were under the poverty line (Children's Rights). Research done by the
Annie E Casey Foundation says that only 20% of the former foster children that
have aged out for 4 years have become successful.
The foster children that have aged out also are at "high risk
for mental and physical health problems" (Casey Family Services). Studies
have shown that throughout 4 states, 30% of the former foster children suffered
from mental health problems, such as depression, drug abuse and anxiety. This
is the case because most of foster children that have aged out do not get
health care after they have aged out. Without any treatment, those foster
children will not be able to work very efficiently which will directly influence
their chances of ending up in poverty. Many of the foster children that have
aged out turn to crime to earn money because they have lost faith in getting a
legitimate job. (The Fosters TV show)
Global
Almost every country in the world has a
foster care system or some other form of it. In the UK, the scheme called The
Staying Put was established in 2008, it is a scheme to help foster young adults
to have better relationships with their foster parents and let them stay in the
foster care system till they turn 21 (Tickle). They provide a more stable
education and training for the foster children that way they can start being
more independent and are able to go out in the world and support themselves.
With the extra years, the foster children can start to move towards
independence, which will ensure that they are able to live independently. The
benefit of this scheme is the training will not only help them when living on
their own, it will also help with adapting to an independent life. In Canada,
this issue is also a huge problem and is being dealt with. The organisation
called Ontario's Child and Youth Advocate is currently dealing with this issue.
Crown wards are the equivalent to foster homes in Ontario, Canada. The minister
of the advocate, Eric Hoskins said that "We've made important changes to
help crown wards find permanent homes; we ensure that crown wards have access
to financial and emotional support until they're 21; we make post secondary
education more accessible to crown wards through tuition grants and assistance
with their application.” According
to the statement above, the Ontario province have put in effort to help
with this issue (The Current). They’ve decided to help by getting the foster
children access to better education, which is the best approach to improving
this issue. The Ontario Child Benefit Equivalent, who works with the advocate,
provides the young people access to social opportunities, educating them on how
to build a life without the support of foster care (Ministry of Children and
Youth Services).
National (USA and HK)
Hong Kong's foster care system also only
keeps the foster children that are under 18 years of age. Mother's Choice is one
of the well-known organisations that offer foster care. Many foster children in
Hong Kong believe that the foster care system is only a temporary arrangement.
However most of them are "stuck" in the system for over 4 years until
they turn 18 with no support they age out. Hong Kong and USA's situation is
similar in the way that there is hardly any support for the former foster
children after aging out. Mother's Choice provides counseling, recreational
activities, referrals to professional services for the foster children. The
advantages of these services are that the foster children will feel safe
because they can always have someone to talk to such as counselors.
In the US, since there are more people it is
easier to get foster parents but the number of children in foster care is
definitely higher in the US.
The US government spends 23.3 million USD on
child welfare annually (Casey Family Programs), however it’s not improving the
wellbeing of the children effectively. The Casey Family Programs is a NGO that
is aiming to improve the wellbeing of the foster children and the foster care
system in the US. They have consulted the nationwide foster care agencies to
provide methods. They’ve proposed that the federal policies should provide programs
that help find permanent homes for the foster children. That way they can have
a permanent family who can support financially to a successful life. Another
suggestion they've made is that organisations that can provide healthcare,
housing, education, employment for young people should be working with foster
care agencies to open a path for the aging out young adults. The Workforce
Investment Act (WIA), US Department of Housing are both programs that can
coordinate with foster care agencies to help the young people successfully
transit into adulthood (Casey Family Programs). More connections to turn to for
support is a good way to prevent them ending in poverty.
There is also a scheme based the US called
Jim Casey Initiative's Success Beyond 18 Campaigns. They invest time into
helping young people through the transition from foster homes to independence.
Their aim is for every former foster child to make a successful transition into
adulthood and independence. They are there to bridge the gap between aging foster
children and permanent stability. Through the scheme, the young people can secure
connections to better education, health care and housing, which is a huge
advantage for them to successfully transit into adulthood (Gary Stangler). Furthermore,
foster children have an option to request more support from the government
after they turn 18 in order to help them lead a more successful life.
"Fostering Connections" is a service can be offered to young adults
that are aging out. This provides the young adults a qualification for
completing high school, enrolment into training, employment for 80 hours a
month and many more. Despite this, the extended care is only temporary until
the young adult can find a permanent home (Court Appointed Special Advocates
for Children). The advantage of this solution is that there are more guarantees
that the young adult will get access to the services because this program has
to be elected by the state hence making it more reliable.
Personal
My opinion is that the US government should
really put more effort into establishing services that provide support for the
former foster children because most of them already have a tough time in the
different foster homes, they don't need another letdown when they are cut from
the foster care system. Appointing a government official to give the child
welfare system the attention that it needs to make improvements. The situation
now is that the US government actually spends a lot on child welfare, however
the children's wellbeing in the US is one of the worst in the world. The
government has the responsibility to support the foster care system and to strengthen
it. The children should be able to live successful lives after being in foster
care. They are to blame for the former foster care young adults ending up in
poverty because their actions are still not enough to support the aged out
young people. Even though this issue doesn't directly influence my life, helping
raise awareness of this issue will help the people affected immensely. After
learning about the conditions that people in poverty have to go through,
helping raise awareness of this issue should be encouraged. In addition, in
future years our generation are going to become adults, they should also think
twice before deciding to have children because the child should be brought up
well and not as a one-night mistake. If more people make better decisions
beforehand then fewer children will end up in foster care.
Future Scenarios
If the US government put effort into
improving the situation, it will raise awareness about this issue. Therefore,
it will inspire more organisations to help with this issue, which will help so
many more young adults break the cycle of poverty and have a better standard of
living. The earlier the foster children get the opportunity to work with
programs that can help them successfully go into adulthood, the chance of them
ending up in poverty will lessen greatly. The solutions to this problem will be
effective if the government and the foster care agencies put in enough effort.
This might affect the employment rate for young people who are not part of the
foster care system because they get fewer opportunities, due to the foster
children being prioritized. Despite this minor disadvantage, the other young
people already have luxuries and most of them have a higher standard of life
compared to the foster children, thus concludes that the solutions mentioned above
are practical and reduces the number of people ending up in poverty due to
aging out. If the parents of this generation don't change the way they take
care of their children, it is said by the Casey Family Programs that from now
till 2020, 9000000 more children will experience foster care. Only 300000 of
the young adults nationwide are able to successfully age out and transit into
adulthood, which means the issue will worsen.
Conclusion
In Conclusion, the issue raised here can
definitely be improved further through time and effort and should be provided
by the US government. They are to blame for the young adults suffering in
poverty and they have the responsibility to make it right. Offering better
education, providing more time to adapt, more connections with services that
can support them financially and getting permanent families are all effective
methods to reducing the number of foster children ending up in poverty.
No comments:
Post a Comment